THE Leader of Government Business, Hon. Peter Tsiamalili Jr, has come forward to address the ongoing discourse surrounding the Vote of No Confidence (VONC) and related democratic processes.
Recent events, particularly the public statement by the Honourable Member for North Fly, Mr. James Donald, regarding his decision not to participate in the upcoming VONC, have drawn considerable attention. While every Member of Parliament has the right to exercise their conscience in such matters, it is equally important that we uphold the spirit and integrity of the institutions we represent.
“Let me begin by affirming that the VONC is a legitimate and constitutionally provided mechanism under Section 145 of the National Constitution. It is an important democratic tool that ensures accountability and offers a peaceful means of transition where it is deemed necessary by the majority of Parliament. However, this process must be treated with the gravity, responsibility, and maturity it deserves”.
Over the past year, the Opposition has attempted on multiple occasions—seven, to be exact—to invoke this mechanism. Each time, we have witnessed motions that have fallen short not only on procedural grounds but also due to a lack of unity, coherence, and clear alternative leadership within the Opposition ranks.
There have been instances of motions being submitted with procedural flaws—such as invalid signatures, incorrect sequencing, or contradictory declarations. At times, the public has been left confused by the frequent changes to the alternate Prime Minister nominee, creating a perception of instability rather than offering a credible alternative to government.
This ongoing pattern does not reflect well on the functioning of our parliamentary democracy. The people of Papua New Guinea expect and deserve responsible leadership, not political theatre.
The recent withdrawal of support by Mr. Donald—himself a signatory to the motion and to the nomination of the alternate Prime Minister—adds to the growing public perception of disarray and a lack of seriousness within the Opposition. It further exposes the internal divisions, absence of strategic direction, and lack of consensus on the very leadership they seek to present as an alternative government.
At the heart of this issue lies a broader concern: the misuse of the Vote of No Confidence to pursue narrow political interests at the expense of national stability and public confidence. When the process is used not as a genuine accountability mechanism, but as a political tactic, it erodes trust in our parliamentary system and undermines the credibility of those who advocate for change.
“Let me be clear—this Government does not oppose the constitutional right of any Member to move a Vote of No Confidence. However, we believe such a move must be anchored in principle, not personal ambition. It must be backed by a clear and credible leadership team, a coherent policy direction, and a genuine commitment to govern—not just to remove.
What we have witnessed instead is a repeated pattern of disorganization, contradiction, and political opportunism, leading to confusion among the public and disappointment among even the Opposition’s own members.
The people of Papua New Guinea must not be misled by claims that the Government or the Speaker are deliberately obstructing the process. The facts speak for themselves: motions have been rejected because they did not meet the legal and procedural standards required under our Constitution. No one is above the law—not even those who seek to use the law for political convenience.
“I call on our citizens to reflect on these developments with discernment. In times of uncertainty, it is easy to be swayed by loud voices or dramatic claims, but we must always return to the facts, the Constitution, and the truth. Our democratic processes must not be weaponized for political gain—they must be safeguarded and respected by all sides of the House.
Let us not forget that our nation faces pressing challenges—from law and order, infrastructure and healthcare, to education, economic empowerment, and climate resilience. These challenges require a stable and functioning government—one that is focused on delivery, not distracted by political maneuvering.
To our people: this Government remains committed to delivering the services and stability you deserve. We are not distracted. We are focused on strengthening governance, protecting the rule of law, and delivering real development outcomes to every province and every community.
To the Opposition: if you truly believe that change is necessary, then demonstrate it through unity, integrity, and respect for due process. Bring your case with clarity, with leadership, and with honour. Anything less is an insult to the intelligence of our people and the dignity of our Parliament.
“I urge all Members of Parliament—whether in Government or Opposition—to reflect deeply on the weight of the offices we hold. We are here not for ourselves, but for the people. Let us restore dignity to our parliamentary democracy and recommit to the national interest above all else.
Let us uphold the trust our people have placed in us — with seriousness, with respect, and with purpose.
“May God continue to bless our people, guide our Parliament, and uphold the peace and unity of our beloved Papua New Guinea”.